Hello organisers, The Active Learning step allows two submissions to the test split. If a group makes both, is its AL standing (for the co-authorship criterion and for the Prospective-round invitation) based on its **better** submission, so that a weaker second file cannot lower it, or on the latest one, or on both pooled? Thread 14549 discusses two test-set submissions, but we could not find a statement of how the two are combined for the AL ranking. Thank you.

Created by Vũ Mai VBDI_Bio_FEx_TeamVNG
Hello @VBDI_Bio_FEx_TeamVNG, the criteria do not change between the Active Learning Step and the Blind Test Step. For the invitation to the Prospective Phase of the challenge the best result from the two submissions is considered. For co-authorship, since the objective of the overview paper is to feature successful methods, all workflows performing better than random will be considered. This also mean that if both submissions perform better than random, we require two writeups (one per workflow) before formally accepting someone as a co-author. Luca

Active Learning step: which of a team's two test-split submissions sets its AL standing? page is loading…